Pretty cool article

Here you go:

I assume the writer of the article is reporting the facts accurately here regarding the actions of this journalist, but we don’t really know, do we? Was he there at the time and did he witness these events? Or are we reading about them second or third hand, or are things being left out?

If all this is true, then it sure is consistent with the typical silencing done by our government and its branches. We do not have Freedom of Speech. If you think you do, you do not have Freedom of Speech. You have wool over your eyes. How can that be in any way Freedom? How can anyone communicate without seeing the recipient audience? For all you know, they’re asleep. Counting sheep.


Feedback and comments welcome!